UTRGV / COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE / MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

TEAM 9: Design of a Morphing Winged Agriculture Surveillance Drone

 

SDI Students (L-R)

·         Justin Mares

·         Rene Perez

·         Mario Barrera

·         Brandon Lira

·         Vanessa Gamboa

 

Faculty Advisor(s)

·         Dr. Isaac Choutapalli

·         Dr. Nadim Zgheib

 

Course Instructors

·         Dr. Noe Vargas Hernandez

·         Mr. Greg Potter

 

 

INDEX

WELCOME

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WE ARE TRYING TO SOLVE?

IMPORTANT TO KNOW

WHY IS THIS PROBLEM IMPORTANT?

OUR PROPOSED SOLUTION

FROM IDEA TO REALITY

PROTOTYPE EARLY AND OFTEN

FINAL PRODUCT

FUTURE WORK

LEARN MORE ABOUT OUR DESIGN PROCESS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

FEEDBACK

 

WELCOME!

Welcome! We are Team #9, known as "Doritos Locos Tacos". Throughout the Spring and Fall of 2024, our dedicated team members - Mario, Justin, Rene, Vanessa and Brandon - collaborated on an innovative project titled "Design of Morphing Wing Agricultural Surveillance Drone". Our objective was to tackle the challenge of creating a drone equipped with morphing wing capabilities. Through meticulous design and engineering, we developed a device that not only boasts lightweight construction but also excels in energy efficiency. We are thrilled to present our project in hopes that you will find it as engaging and inspiring as we did throughout its development.

Welcome.mp4

 

Back to INDEX.

 

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WE ARE TRYING TO SOLVE?

We are striving to create an agricultural surveillance drone to aid farmers in effectively surveying their land for any factors hindering crop growth ranging from pests to disease that affects plants. This drone will be a fixed-wing model with morphing capabilities, utilizing memory shape material to switch between airfoils and enhance its aerodynamic capabilities. By providing comprehensive property surveys through use of a FPV modular camera, this technology aims to significantly improve productivity and agricultural efficiency.

 

 

Back to INDEX.

 

IMPORTANT TO KNOW

To better understand the problem between 20% to 40% of global crop production is lost annually to pests, resulting in staggering economic impacts. Plant diseases alone cost the global economy around $220 billion (about $680 per person in the US) annually, while invasive insects incur losses of approximately $70 billion (about $220 per person in the US), according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [1]. Weed’s also pose a significant threat to global food production. Given these challenges, innovative solutions are urgently needed. Our forthcoming technology aims to revolutionize crop protection, offering a proactive approach to mitigate the impact of pests on agriculture and enhance global food production.

Bacterial Leaf Streak in Corn | Crop ...Tracking Tar Spot in Corn 2018 | Integrated Crop Management

Agriculture threats

Agricultural Threats (Leaf diseases (Top L- Leaf Streaks Top R- Tar spots) & Pests)

 

Back to INDEX.

 

WHY IS THIS PROBLEM IMPORTANT?

Implementing innovative solutions to combat crop loss caused by pests and plant disease can yield significant economical and societal benefits. By reducing crop losses, farmers can increase their yields and revenue while stabilizing prices for consumers. Enhanced food security leads to stronger rural communities and improved public health outcomes. The Figure on the bottom shows a statistic collected by The Crop Protection Network that we lose 116.8 million bushels of Corn to tar spots and a bushel of corn costs 4.36 $ USD.

 

 

Back to INDEX.

 

OUR PROPOSED SOLUTION

Our solution is to use drone technology to identify and monitor pest infestations, potential crooks and agricultural diseases. The drone is to be equipped with an on-board camera for live viewing and photography. The camera is also modular and can be swapped to an infrared. Early detection creates an opportunity to stop the spread of infestations or potential predators, thus increasing crop yields.  The drone is meant to be small and efficient, to fly at least 45 min of flight time, and have a range of 5 km. We are trying to match our competitors which is the DJI mini 3 pro and Crop X.

L- Crop-x R- DJI Mini 3 Pro

Back to INDEX.

 

FROM IDEA TO REALITY

                It has been difficult bringing this project to life but what we have been able to achieve has been purely theoretical. We’ve also 3-D printed designs for fuselage and airfoils as proof of concept and what we plan to bring to reality next is to achieve sustainable flight and reliably morph our wings. The wings morphing capabilities will be done through the use of Nitinol, a Shape memory alloy that will be reliably trained to change shape when heated above 45 degrees Celsius. When implementing the metal only the bottom half of the airfoil will be made of the shape memory material and will be heated through a direct current and nichrome wire. Another specification of note is that this drone will be a fixed wing micro aerial vehicle so it will have an aspect ratio no greater than 2.5.

Back to INDEX.

 

PROTOTYPE EARLY AND OFTEN

A person holding a paper hat

Description automatically generatedImage result for camber airfoil

Preliminary Prototype & camber diagram

The preliminary prototype was developed to understand how the chamber of the airfoil will change.

Prototype v1

Prototype v1 was created to understand the scale at which the model would be produced. The drone is targeted to have an aspect ratio of 2.5 with a wingspan of 9 in.

Prototype v2

The second prototype model was designed to be more streamlined as in prototype v1 the dent in the fuselage reduced internal space and reduced aerodynamic performance.

Prototype v3

In prototype v3, we added a removable cover for better access to the internals. The placement of the cover is not optimal, and a better solution will be needed in the future.

A drawing of a white object

Description automatically generatedAirfoil Prototype

The airfoil prototype was created to understand how the nitinol was going to be placed in the airfoil.

A infrared image of a square object

Description automatically generated

Our initial attempt at running a heat test with nitinol using an electrical current. Through this test, we realized that we were getting hot spots, and the heat wasn't being dispersed evenly and in a timely manner. So, we transitioned into using nichrome wire for assistance another challenge with the metal creating a short circuit arise, but this was then mitigated with a thermal heating pad electrically insulating the nichrome from the nitinol. Giving us the results we wanted.

 

Test connections

Using a breadboard and a power supply we created a prototype that will be used to heat our nichrome wire on command. The final product will use an electrical current activated by a raspberry pi.

A scale with an orange and black object on it

Description automatically generated

Test Fit

The test fit was created to understand how the electrical components would fit inside the fuselage.

 

 

 

 

 

Back to INDEX.

 

FINAL PRODUCT

   Our final product we have created a proof-of-concept airfoil and how it will implement our shape memory alloy in order to reliably morph.

 

Back to INDEX.

 

FUTURE WORK

   The next step to really optimize this project is to fly the drone with the morphing wing and to see where we can minimize the weight of the drone to make it within tolerance.

 

Back to INDEX.

 

IN CONCLUSION

  Our senior design experience was a learning experience that included aerodynamics and fluid dynamics. We learned what it will take to achieve stable flight, and we learned it’ll take more work to implement our morphing wing tech since it has never been implemented in this fashion before. This project also gave experience in problem identification, conceptual design, cost analysis, testing and data analysis

 

Back to INDEX.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Nifa Authors Lori Tyler Gula. (n.d.). Researchers helping protect crops from pests. National Institute of Food and Agriculture. https://www.nifa.usda.gov/about-nifa/blogs/researchers-helping-protect-crops-pests#:~:text=Between%2020%25%20to%2040%25%20of,Organization%20of%20the%20United%20Nations.

 

[2]Corn disease loss estimates from the United States and Ontario, Canada - 2022. Crop Protection Network. (2023, February 6). https://cropprotectionnetwork.org/publications/corn-disease-loss-estimates-from-the-united-states-and-ontario-canada-2022

[3] Jani, J. M., Leary, M., Subic, A., and Gibson, M. A., 2013, “A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities,” Materials & Design (1980-2015) [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261306913011345

[4] Taha, O. Y., Experimental-study-on-two-way-shape-memory-effect- ... [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Obai-Taha/publication/283807098_Experimental_study_on_two_way_shape_memory_effect_training_procedure_for_NiTiNOL_shape_memory_alloy/links/5c1f4951458515a4c7f29ba2/Experimental-study-on-two-way-shape-memory-effect-training-procedure-for-NiTiNOL-shape-memory-alloy.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

Back to INDEX.

 

LEARN MORE ABOUT OUR DESIGN PROCESS

FIGURE 2: HEAT LOST BY FORCED CONVECTION

                                                                         (1)

By using the convection equation in (1) and plotting it over the range of the coldest to the highest temperatures in Texas [2], the linear plot in figure 2 is created. This would allow the drone to calculate how much heat is being lost due to forced convection.

A graph of a graph showing the temperature of a pad

Description automatically generated

FIGURE 3: HEAT LOST BY FORCED CONVECTION

                                                                    (2)

                                                           (3)

 

By using the using both equations (2) and (3), the time it takes for the nitinol to reach 50°C can be found. Since forced convection is happening to the nitinol, it decreases in temperature in the beginning. It then proceeds to heat up due to the nitinol.  

A graph with different colored lines

Description automatically generated

FIGURE 4: VELOCITY VS THRUST

                                                                                         (4)

                                                                             (5)

By obtaining the coefficient of lift and the coefficient of drag at every stage the thrust required can be calculated. Figure 4 visualizes the differences in the airfoils and how the thrust required changes with increased weight.

 

Back to INDEX.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The team received help from various people, their help was critical to our success, we would like to acknowledge.

·         Dr. Isaac Choutapalli

·         Dr. Nadim Zgheib

·         Dr. Vargas

·         Mr. Potter

 

 

Back to INDEX.